| 
			 
			Former ACSA Chairman Dr. Jack A. Shulman comments about ACSA's opinions: 
			 
			
				"This Bin 
				Laden Tape on Al Jazeera, October 29, 2004, is the 'GO CODE' 
				ACSA's experts predicted. However, it has given it's message in 
				"alternatives" designed to try and convince America to 'coward 
				out', even though it is extremely likely Bin Laden is simply 
				trying to clear the way for justification for further attacks on 
				America.  It included messages for Al Qaeda 
				terrorists who could engage in possible Election Day or pre-Election 
				Day Terrorism. Or even more likely: to go on with their long 
				range plans for after the election, while Bin Laden waxes metaphorically about 
				withholding an attack, to see if he can help get Kerry elected.  
				To Bin Laden, a Bush defeat is as good as a win in war - 
				reprisal against Bush for 'destroying the Taliban, and waging 
				war against Al Qaeda.'  Clearly, the strongest aspect of 
				the message is that Bin Laden himself appears to be wavering.  
				The proper response: send Bin Laden a clear cut message - 
				reelect President Bush and endorse his strategies against 
				terrorism, THEY ARE TAKING THEIR TOLL ON BIN LADEN. HE KNOWS 
				BUSH IS GOING TO WIN THE ELECTION. So he wants to enmities 
				President Bush, trying to make his policies 'scapegoat' for why 
				the next attack was ordered.   This, to continue to 
				try and erode America's support for the war against Terrorism.  
				It's a volatile situation, the more we successfully predict, the 
				more Pakistan and Bin Laden will try and shift strategies and 
				perception.  That's 'entropy' in motion, a process whereby 
				the more you attempt to observe a phenomenon, the more effect 
				you have upon it."  
				 
				"It is interesting to note that
				Bin Laden's strategy, to promote Kerry (or rather: to oppose 
				Bush), shows that Terrorists do not 
				fear Kerry, instead they seem to believe his election would 
				insure that America's ability to defend itself will be weakened. 
				But they clearly FEAR GEORGE W. BUSH in a big, big way, or they 
				would not be spreading around money buying up the Michael Moores 
				or the Zack Exleys to lay down a deceptive smoke screen trying 
				to hide their motives and methods.   
				Whatever the agenda, whatever the timing, rest assured any offer 
				or claim made by Bin Laden is simply self-serving and 
				meaningless, an empty promise he can and will not keep, and a 
				false cause explanation - it had nothing to do with the election 
				- they simply intended to attack us with MEGA terror.  They will do, or attempt to do, exactly what 
				they intended to do all along. You can neither reason with nor 
				negotiate with Terrorists - it is not in their nature, they are 
				simply about killing in as terroristic a manner as many people 
				as possible, that there is only one way to deal with them: take 
				them out.  Yet it is in the Terrorist's nature to raise and 
				offer false hope to try and better their cause (usually followed 
				by going ahead with the murders anyway, just to evoke the terror 
				against a blanched background of false hope).  And, in my 
				opinion, if John Kerry were elected, that would quite certainly 
				better their cause.  You see: Terrorists everywhere are in 
				jeopardy if President George W. Bush is re-elected and if after 
				his second term, another President takes office who is as 
				capable of focusing our resources on bringing about an end to 
				Terrorism." 
				 
				
					
					A COMPLEX PLOY... 
				 
				"Combined with yesterday's 
				'Assam the American' tape, threatening an attack which will 
				'Dwarf 911', 'blood will run like water', 'Americans will mourn 
				in silence unable to count their dead', seems to create 
				'plausible deniability' Al Qaeda 
				may use to attempt to disclaim responsibility for whatever 
				attacks are to be attempted on the United States by Al Qaeda. Or 
				the two Tapes were simply 
				to throw a curve to create Press confusion.  Either way, we have the new 1-2 punch tactic, like Al Zavaharis's two Tapes.  We at ACSA are now remaining mute 
				on what we know to be happening, because we believe the US 
				Government is in a position to successfully intercept Al Qaeda's 
				bombers.  To us: 'Assam the American' appears to be a 
				'responsibility cut-out' or 'curve ball'.  It seems that 
				Bin Laden is not up to such a long winded exercise in terrorist 
				threatening, his health must be failing, in spite of 
				appearances, so the 'two party 
				calling' system is probably being used to simultaneously find 
				him shelter and keep him from over-exposure.  This suggests 
				a variation on the 'good Terrorist / bad Terrorist' ploy. It 
				suggests that Bin Laden thinks he can get John Kerry elected by 
				threatening, as if he won't direct terror at America if it votes 
				Kerry (FAT CHANCE).  
				It suggests that he and Arafat are in league, too.  It 
				suggests that they believe that John Kerry and Hillary Clinton 
				will welcome this low Dog of a human Devil, Osamma Bin Laden, to 
				the 'White House' in open arms if only Bin Laden's connection to 
				the potential terror attack somehow caused Kerry to win, despite 
				the fact that Kerry is losing in the polls by 16 percent at this 
				exact moment." 
				
					
					A BAD FAITH 
					OFFER TO WITH-HOLD TERROR, ON THE FACE OF ADMITTING HE'D 
					ORDERED 9/11 (WHICH IS JUST BIN LADEN'S WAY OF PROTECTING 
					PRESIDENT PARVEZ MUSHARRAF OF PAKISTAN) ANYONE WHO'D BELIEVE 
					BIN LADEN WOULD HAVE TO BE SELF DELUSIONAL 
				 
				"This message and yesterday's 
				from 'Assam the American' are inexorably linked and constitute an 
				international 
				anathema, a crime against all of Islam and America and the world, 
				fundamentalist blackmail.  It besmirches everyone from the 
				good people of the middle east to our Muslim neighbors here in 
				the USA.  It is designed to trigger racial hatred over the 
				potential for impending terror while one of the two messages 
				threatens an attack that will dwarf 9/11, the other offers to 
				withhold it if America only votes Kerry. We say: KAH-KAH! It 
				simply PROVES our point at ACSA, that the same hand coordinating 
				John Kerry, is also coordinating Bin Laden.  It's not just 
				that Kerry will be weaker on Terror, it's that there is a hidden 
				agenda, 
				particularly if it is followed up by a violent suicide attack or 
				attacks on the USA even if Kerry were, however unlikely, to 
				prevail.  It tries to hide in the cracks behind 
				Hamas attacks on Israel, and in the splinters of the shattered 
				terror network that gave it birth.  This perfidy suggests 
				that Bin Laden is trying to be clever, yet he may just have been 
				a bit TOO clever, because he proved our point here at ACSA - 
				it's about getting Bush out and Kerry in so the $45 Trillion in 
				barrels of oil beneath the sands of Iraq can be ripped out from 
				under the Iraqi people and stolen by certain Big Oil companies, 
				something Bush has continuously prevented." 
				
					
					STAGE MANAGEMENT AT THE OK CORRAL 
				 
				"Worse: it all suggests coordination by third parties writing a 
				script, parties in league both with Bin Laden and Kerry and who 
				drive the incredibly naive US Press who have apparently no idea 
				they are being carefully baited by both Al Qaeda AND John Kerry. 
				The two parties have, perhaps wrongly, adjudged the Press stupid and lazy trouble 
				seekers and trouble makers.  Our prediction of their 
				intended goal regarding Kerry and Clinton is our predilection 
				based on their perhaps wrong assumption Americans are so dumb they won't 
				realize that John Kerry is not the right man to carry on this 
				struggle against anti-American Terror and are too dumb to 
				recognize the oil-intent behind the Rockefeller allied John 
				Kerry. Well, American's are not dumb, far from it."  
				 
				"In my book, just to 
				send a message, right now EVERY 
				AMERICAN should be so angry at Al Qaeda's backers, so angry at 
				the Democratic Party for failing to deal with him on Clinton's 
				watch, due to liberal neglect of a multitude of opportunities 
				between 1995 and 2000, and should be so angry at the Rockefeller 
				Oil Consortium for apparently stirring this situation up, that not only should every American 
				respond instantly and vote to re-elect President Bush, it should 
				send a very strong message to Islamist Terrorists everywhere by 
				shouting at the terrorists: 'We refuse to capitulate to the weak 
				in the knees, fear-driven approach of cowardice driven vote 
				getting.  No 
				American who is a true American takes a threat like this not to 
				heart in a way that responds with cowardly claims of trying to 
				be more sensitive to Terrorist Causes.  [That is 
				what Bin Laden is appealing to by demanding America stop 
				'threatening Islamic security' (what he means is to stop trying 
				to fight against Terrorism, it has nothing to do with Islamic 
				security) and if you recall, it was the catch phrase for John 
				Kerry's 'plan' to deal with the threats from Al Qaeda - 'being 
				more sympathetic to those causes' - a direct quote from the 1st 
				Presidential Debate, and from numerous previous Kerry 
				speeches.]" 
				 
				"We must say to the Terrorists - "You want us to stop supporting 
				President Bush's fight against Terrorism - here's our reply - 
				UNITY BEHIND PRESIDENT BUSH and his fight against terrorism: the line is 
				drawn at our borders, you cross them, Al Qaeda, in violence and you 
				will pay for it with your very lives. To any politician who 
				blames this on ANYONE OTHER THAN THE TERRORISTS THEMSELVES, we 
				need reply: 'Mr. 
				Kerry - you have only yourself to blame, you did not support the 
				Administration's efforts, you have sought to undermine them 
				politically to get yourself elected, even your own Wife has 
				claimed the Administration is hiding Bin Laden in essence, in 
				the basement of the White House.  You, Senator, are a weak knee'ed opportunist,  your behavior during the anti-War 
				Vietnam era has marked you for the opportunist who will take any 
				position that will promote him politically, even besmirching the 
				entire reputation of your very fellow soldiers.  You and 
				your allies are so far away from the facts, that when you or 
				they speak it forces everyone to hold back their guffaws.' " 
				 
				ACSA 
				tactical encryption expert, Dr. Milton Abrahamson added: "Even 
				Arafat going to France for treatment is another indicator that 
				the impending attack will either be done by a multitude of 
				suicide bombs, or will use Biological Weapons or Nuclear 
				materials. Arafat does not want to be in the driver's seat in 
				it's aftermath it appears, or even in the West Bank during Bin 
				Laden's Taped Messages. Our reply should be: Arafat be damned, Bin Laden 
				be damned, Al Qaeda be damned, Hamas be Damned, and those in America and 
				around the world who sympathize or for personal gain have invited 
				this situation  
				be on notice: strike us if you do and the penalty paid by Al 
				Qaeda and any government harboring them will be EXTINCTION, any 
				people who assist them or brokered terrorism will be Prosecution 
				and the only outcome: we will bring EVERYONE INVOLVED to 
				justice: American Justice. You who attack us have not judged us 
				well, you who help them have not either.  Attack us and the 
				responding vengeance will completely challenge your own 
				comprehension of reality, will entirely reap tenfold that which 
				you sow." 
				
					
					ACSA ENDORSES PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH 
					IN 2004 
				 
			 
			ACSA previously 
			noted that it is giving it's endorsement to President George W. Bush 
			because: "any reasonable man who thinks there is no threat of 
			Terrorism is not sane, any person who thinks it is all a result of 
			'insensitivity' somehow equates anti-Semitic suicide bombings with 
			'justified military action', and bulldozing of the homes of suicide 
			bombers as 'unsolicited aggression'. Same has no idea of history.  John 
			Kerry has repeatedly demonstrated he supports Palestinian aggression 
			against Israelis as if it was justified by their alleged 
			dispossession of the territory, failing to admit that the 
			Palestinians were from Jordan and GIVEN a HOMELAND by Israel, which 
			they have repeatedly refused to accept until, to quote an older more 
			threatening Arafat: 'we have driven the Israelis into the Sea.' "  This 
			current crop of Hitlerian persecution of the Jews originated in the 20's and 
			30's in the United States, surprisingly, in the trans-genetic 
			'racial cleansing' theories of the Office of Human Genetics created 
			by the Rockefeller Institute and Carnegie Foundation. 
			 
			ACSA has cited 
			many studies that demonstrate that while it's origins started with 
			Supremacists in the US, among them those who had founded the KKK, it 
			rapidly spread to Nazi Germany, and Russia (where hatred of Jews 
			among the Bolsheviks and the Tsar had been key political levers for 
			redirecting hatred of the Tsar and the Bolshevik leadership against 
			a scapegoat), only to follow the few 
			surviving Jews of the Holocaust and Eastern Europe who were 
			summarily deposited in Israel after World War II. They found 
			themselves having to form and defend a homeland to defend their very 
			lives 
			from Hitlerian, neo-Office of Human Genetics Master Race trained 
			Islamist Fascists in the 1940's and 1950's, as well as to convince 
			the world to treat them with dignity and respect.  Those 
			Islamist Fascists, trained by Adolph Hitler's NAZI PARTY in the 30's 
			and 40's, gave rise to today's 
			Al Qaeda and other anti-Jewish, anti-American activities attempting 
			to commit state sanctioned genocide against the Jews.  But they 
			became a weapon of big business interests using them to manipulate 
			Big Oil.  To 
			claim that Racial Hatred is the sole issue, is untrue. It is 
			actually largely about political manipulation at the expense of the 
			Jews, a promotion of Oil and 
			Resource thievery by one big business consortium, the one tactically 
			backing John Kerry, which is using the 
			terrorists as a prod to drive America to vote one way in the 
			upcoming election, or to take military action by 
			provoking it by threatening to lift sanctions and give Saddam 
			Hussein the A-Bomb. And use the Israelis or anti-Jewish settlement 
			as false justification, attacking their alliance with America that 
			has been so beneficial to the world through the spread of democracy 
			and human freedom. 
			 
			ACSA has suggested that these big business interests are playing a 
			very dangerous game of brinkmanship that could result in terrorists 
			using nuclear weapons against America, killing those very business 
			people with their covert oil-stealing agenda. ACSA has pointed out 
			repeatedly that those business people are "FAR FROM representative 
			of America or American Government but are giving it and us a bad 
			name." ACSA believes the oil interests manipulating the situation 
			for leverage in Iraq today trying to remove Bush, are committing "a crime against Humanity which 
			the responsible Oil Company consortium and it's leadership should be 
			prosecuted for instigating,  their assets Nationalized and 
			their key management personnel sent to jail for participating in 
			this misconduct 
			for a number of decades.  We believe those responsible for 
			instigating terrorism against America should spend time in a prison, 
			time enough to think about what the consequences of 
			their instigation and misconduct is.  Any who knowingly had a hand in stage 
			managing the action, should pay for the terrorism as if they were 
			participants in mass murder and treason.  
			
				
					
					THERE'S A FLY IN MY KETCHUP 
				 
			 
			ACSA has recently 
			begun an investigation into the background of Theresa Heinz Kerry's 
			strange statements during the election, among which denigrated First 
			Lady Laura Bush, a former librarian, teacher and homemaker, for 
			allegedly "never holding a real job in her life", and for claiming 
			that "President Bush has Osamma Bin Laden in the basement of the 
			White House and will trot him out in handcuffs just before the 
			election to insure he'll be re-elected." 
			ACSA believes that Mrs. 
			Heinz Kerry (and perhaps John Kerry) somehow had foreknowledge that 
			the two Tapes would be released bearing the content and on the time 
			and dates they were delivered to Al Jazeera and to ABC, and 
			therefore such would even more strongly convince us that they're 
			foreknowledge was indicative of some tie to Al Qaeda through a 
			medium of communication that is not visible at the present moment.   
			Rumors have suggested that Mrs. Heinz Kerry made some very odd 
			contributions to Islamic connected charities over the past years, 
			some of whom, rumors have alleged, are connected to Osamma Bin Laden 
			and Al Qaeda.  It would not be the first time that someone who 
			ran for high office, was somehow indirectly connected with enemies of this 
			country.  Frankly, however, this investigation seems to be 
			touching upon an almost "Manchurian Candidate" story, so we will 
			hold off expressing our opinions about it until we have all the 
			facts at our disposal.  Meanwhile, we are also looking into 
			Michael Moore to see if his connections to fundamental causes are 
			visible, because his use of the 'big lie' has discolored the 
			American electoral process, diminishing it to a battle over 
			perceptions so distorted by his agenda that they are not even 
			remotely footed in reality.  We will find those fundamentalist 
			ties, we have a feeling we might want to start looking at his 
			connectivity with left wing interests in the radio broadcast 
			industry.  Either way, ACSA will continue to report it's 
			findings so the public will have a right to know. 
  
			Copyright 2004 ACSA  |